Funding and Finance
Learning for the 21st Century - Part One: Agenda Point 10

1.32 All providers, sponsors and funders of learning should review and modify their own practices and arrangements to ensure that these stimulate a far wider group of participants and do not constitute barriers and incentives to lifelong learning. Over the lifetime of this Parliament the aim should be, step-by-step to increase the total volume of funding deployed to support lifelong learning by Government, other public authorities, employers, charitable bodies and individuals themselves.

1.33 The aim of public funding should be to:

1.34 Government should take the lead in setting up a new Lifelong Learning Millennium Foundation, building on the ideas set out by Helena Kennedy to create a Learning Regeneration Fund. The new foundation should promote innovation, disseminate good practice, and 'pump prime' new initiatives. It should be a public-private sector initiative with a small executive staff. It should draw on lottery funding from the year 2000 with matching public and private sector funding (until such funding is available, Government should make interim funds available for specific local initiatives). Its principal aims should be to: 1.35 The principles informing access to public funds should be the same for part-time and full-time students, and the Government should move towards equalising public investment for the same 'episode of learning' irrespective of sector, mode or level of learning. As an initial step, and once the new scheme for full-time students in higher education has been implemented, plans should be made for loans for learners to be available on a means tested basis to part-time learners. Steps should also be taken to end the age discrimination which denies access to loans to people over 50 years of age.

1.36 Over the lifetime of this Parliament, Government should initiate discussions to facilitate a full review by all concerned of the appropriate balance of funding to be achieved between different forms and levels of lifelong learning. This should include consideration of priorities for funding within different levels of provision and achievement as well as between them. Particular attention should be given to the devotion of resources to securing basic education, core skills and skills in information technology for the whole of the population. The review should include a consideration of how best employers and individuals can contribute resources to lifelong learning. This should be not only through their energetic support for, and use of, Individual Learning Accounts and through varieties of workplace learning, but also by making use of possible tax and fiscal incentives that might be introduced, following consultation and costing.

Previous Agenda Point Return to Part One