12.21 The main tasks in widening participation in further education have already been set out for the FEFC, in some detail, by the Kennedy Committee. We support its recommendations. They need to be taken up systematically by the FEFC in the second stage of its fundamental review of the funding methodology, giving particular attention to the additional support needed to recruit and promote the achievement of disadvantaged learners who are currently under-represented in further education. The FEFC also needs to develop clear policies and funding arrangements to promote inclusive learning, and the development of inclusive learning environments, amongst all providers within its remit, as defined by the work of the Tomlinson Committee.

12.22 Learners from under-represented groups and backgrounds should be 'unit rich' and those institutions, which demonstrate a capacity to enhance participation from under-represented groups should be appropriately rewarded. Once this is completed, new targets, benchmarks and performance indicators should be established for each recipient of FEFC funding.

12.23 We also believe that the FEFC should open discussions, first with the Local Government Association and then with Government, on a number of other funding questions. These should include the future of 'discretionary' awards, access funds and how best Local Authorities should in future be given access to apply for FEFC funding, bearing in mind the increased strategic role we envisage for them in the promotion of a culture of lifelong learning for all. We believe there is scope for considering a range of options, recognising the likely benefits for collaboration, including closer working relationships between Local Authorities and local colleges and other providers.

Previous Point

Next Point

Return to Section 12