|
|
Conference 2000
|
Towards the Learning & Skills CouncilPeter Mucklow, DfEE Peter identified six key differences between local Learning Skills Councils and Learning Partnerships and followed then with some key common interests. Differences The LSC (and its local arms):
Learning Partnerships
Common Interests Both local LSCs and Learning Partnerships:
Core Roles for Partnerships Peter saw three particular roles as having central importance.
The Next Three Years Learning Partnerships will continue to grow in a variety of ways. They will not be subject to an imposed definition of what they should do or be. The DfEE and the LSC will work together to produce a clear framework for the LSC/LP relationship. The Department will support Partnerships by offering continued guidance, encouraging networking opportunities and promoting good pratice. The £10m funding to support Partnerships will continue to 2002 at least. The Department will also invest significantly in evaluating the impact of Partnerships, as a champion of Partnerships wanting to know how they are working.
Towards the Learning & Skills CouncilMarilyn Hawkins, LSC Executive Director designate for Lincolnshire and Rutland In influencing the LSC, Marilyn advised Partnerships to:
She suggested that Learning Partnerships should give high priorty to collecting and managing data, and to facilitating local data analysis and interpretation. 'Identify gaps in information on participation,' she advised, 'in communities, trade unions and so on. It is worth doing local analyses. Act as a source of local intelligence. After all, you have eighteen months start on the LSC.' To influence planning, Partnerships should ensure a regular dialogue with the local LSC, and could encourage mutual representation by getting LSC members on Learning Partnerships specialist sub-groups. Finally, Marilyn affirmed that both the Secretary of State and John Harwood clearly value Learning Partnerships' ability to assess the needs of local learners and potential learners and to offer respnive and imaginative solutions.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |