|
|
"The Toolkit" - Practice, Progess and Value |
|
Contents Page |
Foreword by the Secretary of State |
Introduction and Summary |
What is a Learning City? |
The Learning City |
Taking the First Steps |
The Structure of this Guide |
The Three Strands of Development |
Strand One: Partnership |
Strand Two: Participation |
Strand Three: Performance |
Useful Publications
Strand Three: Performance2) External Comparison: Benchmarking The challenge for the second level of reflective learning is to move beyond internal assessment of progress to compare with the best practice in other learning cities in similar circumstances. This helps cities to learn from others and to develop understanding about why others in similar situations can do better. This task requires a move beyond quantitative data to an understanding of the qualitative processes within and between organisations, services and communities. "Benchmarking" provides an appropriate mechanism for this process of comparative analysis. Benchmarking Benchmarking is the process of comparing your partnership's performance with that of others in similar circumstances which have achieved the best performance. The process of benchmark comparison begins by identifying the gap(s) between current performance and the best practice of a community which is like in kind. The criteria for comparison derive from wanting to achieve the same objectives from similar sets of circumstances.
|
| Key Elements of a Process Benchmarking Exercise
Local Government Management Board, 1996 |
| As the LGMB emphasises, "Benchmarking does not mean copying what
other people do; it should be a learning process, challenging existing ways of working and identifying step by
step changes that can close the gap between current performance and best practice."
Comparing and Learning from Others The success of benchmarking will depend upon the quality of collaborative learning which the learning city can engender within, and between partnerships. Shared understanding and agreement is the condition and purpose of the learning cycle. This requires trust and co-operative working between different organisations and interests. Benchmark clubs or networks can be formed to support gathering, sharing and understanding information. Recognising the Diversity of Interests The learning city will understand that diversity of interests within the city may hold different substantive values, as well as give different weight to the significance of value for money, service quality and equity. The task over time is to develop some shared understanding about the values which the learning community wishes to assess for what has been achieved. The diversity of stakeholders whose values and interests need to be taken into account include:
The Aims and Tasks of Collaborative Working The processes of reflection and evaluation lead into the tasks of forming shared judgements and agreements about future plans and priorities to improve the learning city. The quality of these judgements will grow out of the quality of collaborative learning which has grown up between authorities, organisations and agencies in the learning city. The DTI/DfEE document "Competitiveness through Partnerships with People" (1997) lists "Five Paths to Sustained Success". These help to summarise the essential conditions of collaborative working:
A community which reflectively monitors and evaluates its development will ensure that the different sectors of the city, town or region are aware of, seek to learn from, and replicate where appropriate imaginative and effective practices of regeneration and lifelong learning.
|
![]() Back |
![]() Home |
![]() Next |