|
|
"The Toolkit" - Practice, Progess and Value |
|
Contents Page |
Foreword by the Secretary of State |
Introduction and Summary |
What is a Learning City? |
The Learning City |
Taking the First Steps |
The Structure of this Guide |
The Three Strands of Development |
Strand One: Partnership |
Strand Two: Participation |
Strand Three: Performance |
Useful Publications
Strand Two: ParticipationLevel 1: Getting Organised Almost all learning cities are ambitious in their intention to consult with and respond to their citizens. This is particularly so because most seek to involve non-traditional participants in learning and they are anxious to develop strategies to do so. Those working in regeneration are conscious that schemes are only likely to be successful if they fit in with the ambitions and desires of the communities they set out to serve. There is a real desire to try to develop "bottom up" rather than "top down" models. However in the development of learning cities, people can be approached and involved not only where they live but also where they work, shop and enjoy their leisure. This is sometimes forgotten, perhaps most often in approaches to employers who sometimes have an uncertain role in initiatives. In organising a strategy for participation, it is vital that all possible avenues are explored. These may include "top down" approaches in terms of awareness-raising. Among learning cities, developing consultation mechanisms has been difficult and slow moving. This is not from lack of will but because of the complexity of the process.
|
| Recognise that the learning city will be made up of many communities. Learning communities are increasingly acknowledging this with the need to learn from them and involve them in decision making processes. |
|
Ideas for Action
Consultation procedures at the beginning of initiatives should involve representatives of agencies and projects which are working in areas where consultation processes are needed. It is difficult for consultation to be effective if those being consulted are not aware of the options. Clear information about possible areas for action and awareness raising may need to precede consultation processes. There are natural points for communities to gather - schools are one. Using the community's familiar institutions and networks is a good starting point. Some communities are, in fact, a series of smaller sub-communities which may have different aspirations. It may be necessary to have different strategies to meet the needs of, for example, different ethnic groupings within the population. Consultation on locally significant issues is more likely to arouse interest than an agenda set totally from outside.
|
|
Focus Groups were developed as a form of qualitative market research. They have often been used to
explore the background to customer views in a way that is not possible in opinion surveys. However they
can be used to explore citizens' views and are particularly valuable in exploring the views of groups who
are not normally heard in the working of the authority.
(John Stewart, 1996) |
|
Time and trust are important in dealings with communities. Allow sufficient lead time and resources to enable trust to develop.
Communities can be galvanised by even small amounts of disposable income to use in community improvement. Pitfalls and Perils It is tempting to work through "Community Leaders". But it is vital that these are not self selected or representative of very particular interests within the community. It is important to recognise the contribution and views of the unclubbable members of communities. Do not engage in consultation on issues where policy is already effectively decided and where it is confirmation and not consultation that is sought. Essential Concrete outcomes are vital to the viability of consultation processes. It is better not to consult than to consult about nothing. Assessing Progress at Level One Has the initiative got a clear focus for consultation and targets for which communities will be approached first? Do those working within such communities, e.g. health visitors, social workers, teachers understand what is going on so that activity is not inadvertently sabotaged? Were all sections of the chosen community targeted? If so, which sections were actually involved in consultation: men/women; young/old; some/all racial groups; settled inhabitants/newcomers? Has consultation taken place within the selected community? What methods were used? Which succeeded? Which seemed least useful? Has a workable response been obtained and an action plan drawn up? Have systems been set up which could be re-activated for future consultation? Were issues raised which were unexpected and which changed plans? Facts and Figures Community attitudes to learning and the provision of learning opportunities, together with community development and action are difficult to measure . The first priority might be to establish a baseline. Possible means of collecting data in this area might include:
|
|
Examples in Action
In Derby the Learning City has begun to raise awareness in communities about the power of learning. This uses a city-wide publicity campaign based on the slogan coined by Sir Christopher Ball, "Learning Pays". This has been used in local advertising to promote curiosity and raise interest. The idea is that there should be follow-up activity with media campaigns and leafleting to people's homes. In Newark, the learning community initiative is led by the local college. Real efforts have been made to involve employers and local voluntary organisations in learning, and the identification of learning needs, through a computer link with the college. The college is developing bulletin boards within its web-site for particular interest groups. A survey of 2,000 households on attitudes towards learning and barriers has begun the process of a dialogue with the local community. |
| A Model Community Charter
Citizens wish:
In, John Stewart, "Further Innovation in Democratic Practice", The University of Birmingham, 1996 |
![]() Back |
![]() Home |
![]() Next |