|
| Part 1: The scale of need |
4. The impact of lack of fluency in English4.1 The social arguments for ensuring effective access to learning and high quality ESOL provision are very similar to those for adults with poor basic skills more generally. Lack of fluency in English is likely to affect individuals' ability to secure employment or advancement in the workplace, to gain benefit from further education, to access community and social services and to participate in community life. It may also limit their ability to be involved with and support their own children's education. 4.2 The economic costs are also considerable. Unemployment is much higher than average amongst refugee groups and most settled immigrant communities. For example, in a survey by the Peabody Trust4, 68 per cent of asylum seekers and 47 per cent of those with refugee status or granted exceptional leave to remain were unemployed. The reasons for this are not straightforward but it is clear that lack of fluency in English is an important contributory factor across all groups. For many refugees and asylum seekers it is by far the greatest impediment to entering the job market or education and training. Failure to address these English language needs creates a drain on welfare and other public services like health and immigration, which have to spend time and money on finding solutions to communication problems, such as translation and interpreting services. 4.3 There is also a significant national waste of potential in failing to make the best use of people with professional qualifications and experience, for example in areas of skill shortage like the medical professions, who are cut off by from employment by their lack of fluency in English.
4.4 For the Government's policy of dispersal to be successful in dealing with refugees, effective settlement will be essential. If refugees do not learn sufficient English to be able to participate fully in everyday life and find employment, they will find it even harder to settle in areas where there are fewer members of their own communities.
Footnote
|
![]() Back |
![]() Home |
![]() Next |